<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad Nauseam: Federal Government&#8217;s IR ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/08/04/ad-nauseum-federal-governments-ir-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/08/04/ad-nauseum-federal-governments-ir-ads/</link>
	<description>A blog by an opinionated mother of two, which might lie idle for a while sometimes. The blog, that is.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 09:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/08/04/ad-nauseum-federal-governments-ir-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3093</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=391#comment-3093</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s OK Shula, I would be swearing too.
That&#039;s disgraceful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s OK Shula, I would be swearing too.<br />
That&#8217;s disgraceful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shula</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/08/04/ad-nauseum-federal-governments-ir-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3088</link>
		<dc:creator>shula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 13:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=391#comment-3088</guid>
		<description>Sorry Helen, just realised it&#039;s very rude to swear on someone&#039;s blog.

Got a bit worked up there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Helen, just realised it&#8217;s very rude to swear on someone&#8217;s blog.</p>
<p>Got a bit worked up there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shula</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/08/04/ad-nauseum-federal-governments-ir-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator>shula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 13:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=391#comment-3087</guid>
		<description>My 18 year old boarder just paid $1500 to do two weeks training as a hospital orderly (to learn how to wipe peoples&#039; bums) and then has had to do another 2 weeks unpaid &#039;placement&#039;.

She paid them. Good rort, eh?

Fuckers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 18 year old boarder just paid $1500 to do two weeks training as a hospital orderly (to learn how to wipe peoples&#8217; bums) and then has had to do another 2 weeks unpaid &#8216;placement&#8217;.</p>
<p>She paid them. Good rort, eh?</p>
<p>Fuckers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/08/04/ad-nauseum-federal-governments-ir-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=391#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been noticing the same thing about these ads.

This one particularly wasn&#039;t very bright, as you&#039;ve noted, but it isn&#039;t as if the others were much more convincing. Having a public servant come on the screen and explain that she&#039;s there to protect you if your employer breaks the law is all very nice, except that virtually all of this stuff is legal now - and people know this. It isn&#039;t even coming close to taming the fears people actually hold about this legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been noticing the same thing about these ads.</p>
<p>This one particularly wasn&#8217;t very bright, as you&#8217;ve noted, but it isn&#8217;t as if the others were much more convincing. Having a public servant come on the screen and explain that she&#8217;s there to protect you if your employer breaks the law is all very nice, except that virtually all of this stuff is legal now &#8211; and people know this. It isn&#8217;t even coming close to taming the fears people actually hold about this legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/08/04/ad-nauseum-federal-governments-ir-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=391#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>Five hours? FFS, I mean I might let it go if my spirit was sufficiently broken and the Girlchild was rolling her eyes, but is that going to break the business? Really, they shouldn&#039;t be employing people if they operate on that kind of knife edge!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five hours? FFS, I mean I might let it go if my spirit was sufficiently broken and the Girlchild was rolling her eyes, but is that going to break the business? Really, they shouldn&#8217;t be employing people if they operate on that kind of knife edge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue milk</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/08/04/ad-nauseum-federal-governments-ir-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3070</link>
		<dc:creator>blue milk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=391#comment-3070</guid>
		<description>Great post, I&#039;ve thought the same thing too watching that ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I&#8217;ve thought the same thing too watching that ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann of Brisbane</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/08/04/ad-nauseum-federal-governments-ir-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3068</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann of Brisbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=391#comment-3068</guid>
		<description>Helen, watch out for the unpaid trial.  According to the Workplace Ombudsman&#039;s site &quot;unpaid trial periods are generally unlawful&quot; but it seems they are a common pratice in the hospitality industry for one.
When we support/encourage our young people to seek casual work and get a taste of the work force I reckon most of us tell them not to ask about pay too early in the interview process.
If they are expected to do a trial it is very hard for them to ask &quot;is is paid or not?.&quot;  They are generally just hoping to get a fair go to show their potential. 
I&#039;m hearing of an employer who quoted a registered agreement that enables him to trial someone unpaid for up to 5 hours. That&#039;s not a fair go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helen, watch out for the unpaid trial.  According to the Workplace Ombudsman&#8217;s site &#8220;unpaid trial periods are generally unlawful&#8221; but it seems they are a common pratice in the hospitality industry for one.<br />
When we support/encourage our young people to seek casual work and get a taste of the work force I reckon most of us tell them not to ask about pay too early in the interview process.<br />
If they are expected to do a trial it is very hard for them to ask &#8220;is is paid or not?.&#8221;  They are generally just hoping to get a fair go to show their potential.<br />
I&#8217;m hearing of an employer who quoted a registered agreement that enables him to trial someone unpaid for up to 5 hours. That&#8217;s not a fair go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

