<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who do you trust to keep interest rates low?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/23/who-do-you-trust-to-keep-interest-rates-low/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/23/who-do-you-trust-to-keep-interest-rates-low/</link>
	<description>A blog by an opinionated mother of two, which might lie idle for a while sometimes. The blog, that is.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 09:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/23/who-do-you-trust-to-keep-interest-rates-low/comment-page-1/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=427#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>Wayne Swan has enunciated this several times in the Parliament but usually Howard and Costello just shout him down quoting the headline rate, rather than the more painful truths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne Swan has enunciated this several times in the Parliament but usually Howard and Costello just shout him down quoting the headline rate, rather than the more painful truths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/23/who-do-you-trust-to-keep-interest-rates-low/comment-page-1/#comment-3727</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=427#comment-3727</guid>
		<description>I forgot the link to Andrew Charlton&#039;s (sorry, its not Chaplan!) essay on the Lib&#039;s economic policy for The Monthly. It&#039;s not all online, but well worth getting it in print to read.

http://www.themonthly.com.au/tm/node/680</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot the link to Andrew Charlton&#8217;s (sorry, its not Chaplan!) essay on the Lib&#8217;s economic policy for The Monthly. It&#8217;s not all online, but well worth getting it in print to read.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.themonthly.com.au/tm/node/680" rel="nofollow">http://www.themonthly.com.au/tm/node/680</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/23/who-do-you-trust-to-keep-interest-rates-low/comment-page-1/#comment-3726</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=427#comment-3726</guid>
		<description>The libs have been running that line about how interests rates were so high under Paul Keating and that families really hurt under him that it has become a given.

Then, I read Andrew Chaplan&#039;s debunking of the lib&#039;s myths about interest rates and their economic management, and I was amazed to read that while interests rates were higher in the time of Keating, the amount of household monthly interest repayments was actually lower – because people hadn&#039;t borrowed so much so didn&#039;t owe so much. In all, it took less out of their household weekly budgets.

Then again, it is important to remember that things weren&#039;t all rosy under Keating – it&#039;s important to remember how clothing, textile, leather, steel and other manufacturing workers lost their incomes under the tariff slashes and deregulation. 

So many are putting great stock in Rudd delivering us from Howard, but I&#039;m wondering when we will all wake up and remember how we hated the economic rationalists (remember that term?) who controlled the ALP – and government – in the &#039;85-&#039;96 era and wondered how the government could be so mean while the people lost their jobs, their savings, their self-respect, etc.

The only flicker of light for me is Rudd&#039;s throw-away line that he didn&#039;t want to be prime minister of a country that didn&#039;t make anything any more (uttered when one of the car companies was planning to close a factory).

I certainly hope he means what he says and supports manufacturing again, as making phone calls for a living sure ain&#039;t much fun.

oo. Apologies, helen, I&#039;ve realised my comment turned into a rant which I should have just posted in my own blog. sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The libs have been running that line about how interests rates were so high under Paul Keating and that families really hurt under him that it has become a given.</p>
<p>Then, I read Andrew Chaplan&#8217;s debunking of the lib&#8217;s myths about interest rates and their economic management, and I was amazed to read that while interests rates were higher in the time of Keating, the amount of household monthly interest repayments was actually lower – because people hadn&#8217;t borrowed so much so didn&#8217;t owe so much. In all, it took less out of their household weekly budgets.</p>
<p>Then again, it is important to remember that things weren&#8217;t all rosy under Keating – it&#8217;s important to remember how clothing, textile, leather, steel and other manufacturing workers lost their incomes under the tariff slashes and deregulation. </p>
<p>So many are putting great stock in Rudd delivering us from Howard, but I&#8217;m wondering when we will all wake up and remember how we hated the economic rationalists (remember that term?) who controlled the ALP – and government – in the &#8217;85-&#8217;96 era and wondered how the government could be so mean while the people lost their jobs, their savings, their self-respect, etc.</p>
<p>The only flicker of light for me is Rudd&#8217;s throw-away line that he didn&#8217;t want to be prime minister of a country that didn&#8217;t make anything any more (uttered when one of the car companies was planning to close a factory).</p>
<p>I certainly hope he means what he says and supports manufacturing again, as making phone calls for a living sure ain&#8217;t much fun.</p>
<p>oo. Apologies, helen, I&#8217;ve realised my comment turned into a rant which I should have just posted in my own blog. sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

