<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feminism Failed according to AGE op-ed page (again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/</link>
	<description>A blog by an opinionated mother of two, which might lie idle for a while sometimes. The blog, that is.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 09:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: matilda</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3818</link>
		<dc:creator>matilda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3818</guid>
		<description>Another titbit from the website of The Age, that great bastion of feminism, which continues to uphold the dignity of women to be more than their physical parts: A video of the world&#039;s best bottoms!  And this a day after a truly great opinion piece on &#039;Media&#039;s ugly obsession with women&#039;s looks&#039; by Kate Seear. Nothing like promoting diversity of views.  

The Age website has long featured soft-porn, it used to be preoccupied with Kylie&#039;s bum.  All in the cause of bumping up their page hits, no doubt. It&#039;s time for female Age journalists to stand up and say &#039;enough is enough!   Andrew Jaspan, throw out the degrading images - i don&#039;t want to get all preachy, but really, raunch culture has been glorified for long enough. It&#039;s only teaching our kids that a woman is only as good as her sexy body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another titbit from the website of The Age, that great bastion of feminism, which continues to uphold the dignity of women to be more than their physical parts: A video of the world&#8217;s best bottoms!  And this a day after a truly great opinion piece on &#8216;Media&#8217;s ugly obsession with women&#8217;s looks&#8217; by Kate Seear. Nothing like promoting diversity of views.  </p>
<p>The Age website has long featured soft-porn, it used to be preoccupied with Kylie&#8217;s bum.  All in the cause of bumping up their page hits, no doubt. It&#8217;s time for female Age journalists to stand up and say &#8216;enough is enough!   Andrew Jaspan, throw out the degrading images &#8211; i don&#8217;t want to get all preachy, but really, raunch culture has been glorified for long enough. It&#8217;s only teaching our kids that a woman is only as good as her sexy body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3796</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3796</guid>
		<description>NAILED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NAILED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony T.</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3794</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3794</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can’t make up my mind on Hardy on tv yet but at least she has potential if she can stop trying being too hip and Brunswick.&quot;

She could start by taking herself out of her reviews. Surely, SURELY!, not everything she writes needs to be prefaced with &quot;Last week I found myself necking Cuervos and shots of Turkey on a scarlet ottoman with a too-cool-for-school (oooo, I&#039;m such a dag) young drummer as we listened to Les Savy Fav when I turned on [insert shit show].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can’t make up my mind on Hardy on tv yet but at least she has potential if she can stop trying being too hip and Brunswick.&#8221;</p>
<p>She could start by taking herself out of her reviews. Surely, SURELY!, not everything she writes needs to be prefaced with &#8220;Last week I found myself necking Cuervos and shots of Turkey on a scarlet ottoman with a too-cool-for-school (oooo, I&#8217;m such a dag) young drummer as we listened to Les Savy Fav when I turned on [insert shit show].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue milk</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3788</link>
		<dc:creator>blue milk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3788</guid>
		<description>That was a long, long bow she drew in her thesis. Good on you for casting a critical eye on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a long, long bow she drew in her thesis. Good on you for casting a critical eye on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3783</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3783</guid>
		<description>Thanks folks, sorry you languished so long in the spamulator (except for FX, the spamulator knows him and just burps him out.)  I was looking for the O RLY? owl, but I fell in love with the little... er... walrus, I think he is. Or she.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks folks, sorry you languished so long in the spamulator (except for FX, the spamulator knows him and just burps him out.)  I was looking for the O RLY? owl, but I fell in love with the little&#8230; er&#8230; walrus, I think he is. Or she.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marymary</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3781</link>
		<dc:creator>marymary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3781</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad crikey had a link to this blog today. That article really annoyed me, then I come here and someone has typed what I was thinking (my thoughts were much less coherent though...) and as a bonus, there&#039;s a I can has cheezburger picture! It&#039;s all good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad crikey had a link to this blog today. That article really annoyed me, then I come here and someone has typed what I was thinking (my thoughts were much less coherent though&#8230;) and as a bonus, there&#8217;s a I can has cheezburger picture! It&#8217;s all good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3780</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3780</guid>
		<description>I was also very puzzled by the Age article in that it addresses the Ja&#039;mie character as if she were a participant in a &quot;reality&quot; show or a realistic drama, rather than a comic and satirical creation with a personality and moral framework that&#039;s constructed entirely for, well, comic and satirical effect. Having watched all episodes (with much pleasure) it never occurred to me that she represented some by-product or outcome of feminism, monstrous or otherwise. Creative fictions of all sorts have been riddled with the Ja&#039;mie type of egotistical and insensitive caricature for eons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was also very puzzled by the Age article in that it addresses the Ja&#8217;mie character as if she were a participant in a &#8220;reality&#8221; show or a realistic drama, rather than a comic and satirical creation with a personality and moral framework that&#8217;s constructed entirely for, well, comic and satirical effect. Having watched all episodes (with much pleasure) it never occurred to me that she represented some by-product or outcome of feminism, monstrous or otherwise. Creative fictions of all sorts have been riddled with the Ja&#8217;mie type of egotistical and insensitive caricature for eons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad B</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3777</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3777</guid>
		<description>Great article. 

I saw the headline to The Age article on their website, but didn&#039;t think I&#039;d click on it just in case the idiot author somehow profited half a cent per page view. 


(Oh, but the author of this article is welcome to my two cents.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. </p>
<p>I saw the headline to The Age article on their website, but didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d click on it just in case the idiot author somehow profited half a cent per page view. </p>
<p>(Oh, but the author of this article is welcome to my two cents.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Xavier Holden</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3775</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Xavier Holden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3775</guid>
		<description>The standard in the AGE these days sometimes makes me want to ring up &lt;a href=&quot;http://kalimna.blogspot.com/2007/10/urban-planning-to-resist-tree-changers.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Harry Clarke&lt;/a&gt; for a coffee on Saturday mornings while we read Quad-rant. At first it was just the inconsistent nonsense in films and tv from Schembri, then Sharon Gray went wobbly although she had excuses and a decent past record. I can&#039;t make up my mind on Hardy on tv yet but at least she has potential if she can stop trying being too hip and Brunswick. Deveney  is a sloppy  kneejerk Boltonian horror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The standard in the AGE these days sometimes makes me want to ring up <a href="http://kalimna.blogspot.com/2007/10/urban-planning-to-resist-tree-changers.html" rel="nofollow">Harry Clarke</a> for a coffee on Saturday mornings while we read Quad-rant. At first it was just the inconsistent nonsense in films and tv from Schembri, then Sharon Gray went wobbly although she had excuses and a decent past record. I can&#8217;t make up my mind on Hardy on tv yet but at least she has potential if she can stop trying being too hip and Brunswick. Deveney  is a sloppy  kneejerk Boltonian horror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernice</title>
		<link>http://castironbalcony.media2.org/2007/10/25/feminism-failed-according-to-age-op-ed-page-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3772</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://castironbalcony.media2.org/?p=431#comment-3772</guid>
		<description>What is Jennifer Sinclair taking? I feel as if 20 years of sociological &amp; cultural theory has bypassed her. Nay, make that 40. Goffman springs to mind for starters. 
Oh for heaven&#039;s sake, I&#039;m still trying to think my way through the episode where Jam&#039;ie dates a Year 7 boy...man plays teenage girl who dates child...male child....
Feminist? Jam&#039;ie? yedda yedda yedda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Jennifer Sinclair taking? I feel as if 20 years of sociological &amp; cultural theory has bypassed her. Nay, make that 40. Goffman springs to mind for starters.<br />
Oh for heaven&#8217;s sake, I&#8217;m still trying to think my way through the episode where Jam&#8217;ie dates a Year 7 boy&#8230;man plays teenage girl who dates child&#8230;male child&#8230;.<br />
Feminist? Jam&#8217;ie? yedda yedda yedda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

